Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1410MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +277%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1792
Shading Units
4480
112
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy