Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +56%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy