Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +5030%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
80
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cedar
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy