Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (190W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +47%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tonga
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy