Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (235W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +41%
7.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
2816
224
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Hawaii
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy