Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
RV380
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Rage 9
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy