Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro W600

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
R400
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy