Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FireStream 9250

ATI Radeon X1050 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
200 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
R400
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy