Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
Lower TDP (41W vs 49W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
96
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GF108
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy