Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (27.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
-
Shading Units
96
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy