Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2130MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +16%
12 TFLOPS
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
56
2816
Shading Units
3584
88
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
96
88
Tensor Cores
224
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy