NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (2130MHz vs 1462MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+78%
12 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
18
2816
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
72
22
RT Cores
18
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
