NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2505MHz vs 1980MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 700W)
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 960.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+36%
91.06 TFLOPS
H200 SXM 141 GB
66.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
132
18176
Shading Units
16896
568
TMUs
528
192
ROPs
24
568
Tensor Cores
528
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
700W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GH100
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
80 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
