NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1687MHz vs 1380MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+62%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
1920
80
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
240
20
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
