Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1557MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +567%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
3
3328
Shading Units
384
104
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GP107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy