Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 +83247%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

140W
TDP
12W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G98
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy