Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +1642%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Sep 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G84
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy