FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 475W)
Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro Vega II
+1309%
14090
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2019
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
475W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 20
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
