Quadro K2200 vs Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 68W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+717%
1439
Quadro FX 1800
176
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
12
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
68W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
