Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs A100 PCIe 80 GB

Quadro M2000 vs A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1410MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
A100 PCIe 80 GB +991%
19490
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
A100 PCIe 80 GB +2466%
3722
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1007%
310
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
768
Shading Units
6912
48
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy