Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K4200

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1163MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro K4200 +17%
2107
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro K4200 +22%
178
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro K4200 +14%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
1344
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy