Radeon R9 280 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+218%
10650
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
32
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
