Home Comparison Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs RTX A2000 Max Q

Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs RTX A2000 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
RTX A2000 Max Q +65%
6180

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GA107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net