Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +739%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy