Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1537MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +119%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
832 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
64
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.78 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy