Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
7584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +5908%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
24
120
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
134W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy