Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (239W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +165%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
2880
240
TMUs
240
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
239W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy