Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +178%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
1920
256
TMUs
120
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy