Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +16%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
8192
Shading Units
3840
256
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy