Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +4285%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
240
280
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
12
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
R600
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy