NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA CMP 170HX NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

1664 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2130MHz vs 1410MHz)

Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

CMP 170HX +5%

12.63 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

CMP 170HX

VS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Sep 2021

Release Date

Feb 2024

Mining GPUs

Generation

Quadro Ada

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz

Base Clock

1620 MHz

1410 MHz

Boost Clock

2130 MHz

1458 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

1493GB/s

Bandwidth

256.0GB/s

Render Config

70

SM Count

22

-

Compute Units

-

4480

Shading Units

2816

280

TMUs

88

128

ROPs

48

280

Tensor Cores

88

-

RT Cores

22

192 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

8 MB

L2 Cache

12 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

102.2 GPixel/s

394.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

187.4 GTexel/s

50.53 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

12.00 TFLOPS

12.63 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

12.00 TFLOPS

6.317 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100

GPU Name

AD107

GA100-105F-A1

GPU Variant

-

Ampere

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

7 nm

Process Size

5 nm

54.2 billion

Transistors

18.9 billion

826 mm²

Die Size

159 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

70W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

N/A

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

N/A

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

8.0

CUDA

8.9

N/A

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro RG220A

2

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

3

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI FirePro V7900

4

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

5

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

6

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

7

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

8

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

9

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Sky 700

10

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Green Edition

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD