Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel Arc A750

ATI FireMV 2250 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy