ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+6300%
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
