Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 89W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2005
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
89W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
NV41
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GO6800 U
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy