Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +1525%
0.52 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV610
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy