Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 +36%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
400
Shading Units
240
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GT200B
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy