Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +1278%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Fiji
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy