Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +2540%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
72
480
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
72
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 21
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy