Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 236W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280 +25%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
236W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy