NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (120W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
+230%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
151W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
RV770
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
