Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +498%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
240W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
R600
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy