Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
16704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +12914%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
132
192
Shading Units
16896
64
TMUs
528
28
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GB100
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
208 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy