Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +463%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy