Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1594MHz vs 863MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 765M +8%
1.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1531 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GK106
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy