Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020 +412%
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2016
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy