Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +103%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
64
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy