Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +4706%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy