Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (130W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800 +90%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
189W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy