Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +1024%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
21W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy