Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy